Claim 1:
Mustafa D. Randomised clinical trial of four dental restorative materials. Thesis; 2005.
Annan AL-Ghada, Atef Abdullah. Clinical comparative study of post-operative sensitivity between giomer, Nano hybrid composite, Compomer and RMGIC. Int J Appl Dent Sci 2020;6(3):712-730.
Claim 2:
van Dijken JW, Hörstedt P. Marginal adaptation to enamel of a polyacid-modified resin composite (compomer) and a resin-modified glass ionomer cement in vivo. Clin Oral Investig. 1997 Dec;1(4):185-90.
Claim 3:
Neo J, Chew CL, Yap A, Sidhu S. Clinical evaluation of tooth-colored materials in cervical lesions. Am J Dent. 1996 Feb;9(1):15-8.
LIU Fang, XIONG Yan-jie, ZHAO Wen-feng. Effect of resin modified light cured glass ionomer on subgingival wedge-shaped defects. Chin J Front Med 2017; 9: 204.
Federlin M, Thonemann B, Schmalz G, Urlinger T. Clinical evaluation of different adhesive systems for restoring teeth with erosion lesions. Clin Oral Investig. 1998 Jun;2(2):58-66.
Gladys S, Van Meerbeek B, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. Marginal adaptation and retention of a glass-ionomer, resin-modified glass-ionomers and a polyacid-modified resin composite in cervical Class-V lesions. Dent Mater. 1998 Jul;14(4):294-306.
van Dijken JW. Clinical evaluation of three adhesive systems in class V non-carious lesions. Dent Mater. 2000 Jul;16(4):285-91.
de Oliveira F, Machado L, Rocha E, de Alexandre R, Briso A, Maria Lucia Sundefeld M, Sundfeld R. Clinical evaluation of a composite resin and a resin-modified glass-ionomer cement in non-carious cervical lesions: one-year results. Int J Clin Dent 2012; 5: 155.
Hussainy SN, Nasim I, Thomas T, Ranjan M. Clinical performance of resin-modified glass ionomer cement, flowable composite, and polyacid-modified resin composite in noncarious cervical lesions: One-year follow-up. J Conserv Dent. 2018 Sep-Oct;21(5):510-515.
Ni Cheng-li. Clinical effect on the evaluation of restorations for wedge-shaped defect with four diferent materials. J Taishan Med Univ 2015; 36: 271.
Brackett WW, Browning WD, Ross JA, Brackett MG. Two-year clinical performance of a polyacid-modified resin composite and a resin-modified glass-ionomer restorative material. Oper Dent. 2001 Jan-Feb;26(1):12-6.
Brackett WW, Dib A, Brackett MG, Reyes AA, Estrada BE. Two-year clinical performance of Class V resin-modified glass-lonomer and resin composite restorations. Oper Dent. 2003 Sep-Oct;28(5):477-81.
Burrow MF, Tyas MJ. Clinical evaluation of three adhesive systems for the restoration of non-carious cervical lesions. Oper Dent. 2007 Jan-Feb;32(1):11-5.
Maneenut C, Tyas MJ. Clinical evaluation of resin-modified glass-ionomer restorative cements in cervical 'abrasion' lesions: one-year results. Quintessence Int. 1995 Oct;26(10):739-43.
Abdalla AI, Alhadainy HA. Clinical evaluation of hybrid ionomer restoratives in Class V abrasion lesions: two-year results. Quintessence Int. 1997 Apr;28(4):255-8.
Claim 4:
Mustafa D. Randomised clinical trial of four dental restorative materials. Thesis; 2005.
El Sayed M, Fouad W, Saber H. Evaluation of clinical performance and success of Fuji II and Fuji IX in restoring occlusal caries of primary molars over a one year follow up: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Egypt Dent J 2019; 65: 1.
Qvist V, Laurberg L, Poulsen A, Teglers PT. Class II restorations in primary teeth: 7-year study on three resin-modified glass ionomer cements and a compomer. Eur J Oral Sci. 2004 Apr;112(2):188-96.
Daou MH, Tavernier B, Meyer JM. Two-year clinical evaluation of three restorative materials in primary molars. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2009 Fall;34(1):53-8.
Sengul F, Gurbuz T. Clinical Evaluation of Restorative Materials in Primary Teeth Class II Lesions. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2015 Summer;39(4):315-21.
Abo-Hamar SE, El-Desouky SS, Abu Hamila NA. Two-year clinical performance in primary teeth of nano-filled versus conventional resin-modified glass-ionomer restorations. Quintessence Int. 2015 May;46(5):381-8.
El-Housseiny AA, Alamoudi NM, Nouri S, Felemban O. A randomized controlled clinical trial of glass carbomer restorations in Class II cavities in primary molars: 12-month results. Quintessence Int. 2019;50(7):522-532.
Claim 7:
da Mata C. ART and Conventional Restorations in the Management of Caries in Older Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Working paper; 2010.
da Mata C, Allen PF, McKenna G, Cronin M, O'Mahony D, Woods N. Two-year survival of ART restorations placed in elderly patients: A randomised controlled clinical trial. J Dent. 2015 Apr;43(4):405-11.
da Mata C, McKenna G, Anweigi L, Hayes M, Cronin M, Woods N, O'Mahony D, Allen PF. An RCT of atraumatic restorative treatment for older adults: 5 year results. J Dent. 2019 Apr;83:95-99.
Claims 5, 6 and 8:
Claim 2:
van Dijken JW. 3-year clinical evaluation of a compomer, a resin-modified glass ionomer and a resin composite in Class III restorations. Am J Dent. 1996 Oct;9(5):195-8.
Claim 3:
Folwaczny M, Mehl A, Kunzelmann KH, Hickel R. Clinical performance of a resin-modified glass-ionomer and a compomer in restoring non-carious cervical lesions. 5-year results. Am J Dent. 2001 Jun;14(3):153-6.
Folwaczny M, Loher C, Mehl A, Kunzelmann KH, Hickel R. Class V lesions restored with four different tooth-colored materials--3-year results. Clin Oral Investig. 2001 Mar;5(1):31-9.
Smales RJ, Ng KK. Longevity of a resin-modified glass ionomer cement and a polyacid-modified resin composite restoring non-carious cervical lesions in a general dental practice. Aust Dent J. 2004 Dec;49(4):196-200.
Jyothi K, Annapurna S, Kumar AS, Venugopal P, Jayashankara C. Clinical evaluation of giomer- and resin-modified glass ionomer cement in class V noncarious cervical lesions: An in vivo study. J Conserv Dent. 2011 Oct;14(4):409-13.
Koubi S, Raskin A, Bukiet F, Pignoly C, Toca E, Tassery H. One-year clinical evaluation of two resin composites, two polymerization methods, and a resin-modified glass ionomer in non-carious cervical lesions. J Contemp Dent Pract 2006; 7: 42.
SHEN Yi-yin,LU Qun,WEI Ben-jua. Effects of different dental filling materials in wedge-shaped defect restorations on periodontal tissues. J Shanghai Jiaotong Univ 2010; 30: 1389.
Zhu Min, Zhu Hongbo. The influence of the choice of repairing materials for wedge-shaped defect on the subgingival periodontal tissue. Mod Instr Med 2018; 24: 139.
Perdigão J, Dutra-Corrêa M, Saraceni SH, Ciaramicoli MT, Kiyan VH. Randomized clinical trial of two resin-modified glass ionomer materials: 1-year results. Oper Dent. 2012 Nov-Dec;37(6):591-601.
Claim 4:
Ajami BA, Ebrahimi M, Makarem A, Movahhed T, Motamedi AR. Evaluation of Survival Time of Tooth Color Dental Materials in Primary Anterior Teeth. J Dent Mater Tech 2012; 1(1): 11-8.
Clinical indication(s) / Claim(s)
Verbatim per manufacturer's Instructions-for-use (IFU) sheet
Claim 1: Restoration of limited Class I cavities
Claim 2: Restoration of Class III cavities
Claim 3: Restoration of Class V cavities
Claim 4: Restoration of primary teeth
Claim 5: Core build up
Claim 6: Cases where a radiopaque restoration is required
Claim 7: Geriatric applications
Claim 8: As a base or liner
.
Clinical evidence supporting the claim(s)
From full report(s) of prospective, clinical controlled trial(s)
Clinical evidence not supporting the claim(s)
From full report(s) of prospective, clinical controlled trial(s)
Clinical evidence not related to the claim(s)
From full report(s) of prospective, clinical controlled trial(s)
CQ-Score of the publication
Criterion I = 1 Criterion II = 1 Criterion III = 0 / Total score = 0
CQ-Score of the publication
Criterion I = 1 Criterion II = 0 Criterion III = 0 / Total score = 0
CQ-Score of the publication
Criterion I = 0 Criterion II = 0 Criterion III = 0 / Total score = 0
CQ-Score of the publication
Criterion I = 1 Criterion II = 0 Criterion III = 0 / Total score = 0
CQ-Score of the publication
Criterion I = 1 Criterion II = 0 Criterion III = 0 / Total score = 0
CQ-Score of the publication
Criterion I = 1 Criterion II = 0 Criterion III = 0 / Total score = 0
CQ-Score of the publication
Criterion I = 1 Criterion II = 1 Criterion III = 0 / Total score = 0
CQ-Score of the publication
Criterion I = 1 Criterion II = 0 Criterion III = 0 / Total score = 0
CQ-Score of the publication
Criterion I = 1 Criterion II = 0 Criterion III = 0 / Total score = 0
CQ-Score of the publication
Criterion I = 0 Criterion II = 0 Criterion III = 0 / Total score = 0
CQ-Score of the publication
Criterion I = 1 Criterion II = 0 Criterion III = 0 / Total score = 0
CQ-Score of the publication
Criterion I = 1 Criterion II = 0 Criterion III = 0 / Total score = 0
CQ-Score of the publication
Criterion I = 1 Criterion II = 0 Criterion III = 0 / Total score = 0
CQ-Score of the publication
Criterion I = 0 Criterion II = 0 Criterion III = 0 / Total score = 0
CQ-Score of the publication
Criterion I = 1 Criterion II = 0 Criterion III = 0 / Total score = 0
CQ-Score of the publication
Criterion I = 1 Criterion II = 0 Criterion III = 0 / Total score = 0
van Dijken JW, Pallesen U. Fracture frequency and longevity of fractured resin composite, polyacid-modified resin composite, and resin-modified glass ionomer cement class IV restorations: an up to 14 years of follow-up. Clin Oral Investig. 2010 Apr;14(2):217-22.
Sidhu SK, Sherriff M, Watson TF. In vivo changes in roughness of resin-modified glass ionomer materials. Dent Mater. 1997 May;13(3):208-13.
Winkler MM, Deschepper EJ, Dean JA, Moore BK, Cochran MA, Ewoldsen N. Using a resin-modified glass ionomer as an occlusal sealant: a one-year clinical study. J Am Dent Assoc. 1996 Oct;127(10):1508-14.
Amin HE. Clinical and antibacterial effectiveness of three different sealant materials. J Dent Hyg. 2008 Fall;82(5):45.
Lo EC, Luo Y, Tan HP, Dyson JE, Corbet EF. ART and conventional root restorations in elders after 12 months. J Dent Res. 2006 Oct;85(10):929-32.
Zivojinovi V, Markovi D. Klini~ka ispitivanja efikasnosti minimalnih restauracija okluzalnih povrina zuba. Serb Dent J 2004; 51: 13.
CQ-Score of the publication
Criterion I = 1 Criterion II = 0 Criterion III = 0 / Total score = 0
CQ-Score of the publication
Criterion I = 1 Criterion II = 0 Criterion III = 0 / Total score = 0
CQ-Score of the publication
Criterion I = 0 Criterion II = 0 Criterion III = 0 / Total score = 0
CQ-Score of the publication
Criterion I = 0 Criterion II = 0 Criterion III = 0 / Total score = 0
CQ-Score of the publication
Criterion I = 1 Criterion II = 0 Criterion III = 0 / Total score = 0
CQ-Score of the publication
Criterion I = 0 Criterion II = 0 Criterion III = 0 / Total score = 0
CQ-Score of the publication
Criterion I = 1 Criterion II = 0 Criterion III = 0 / Total score = 0
CQ-Score of the publication
Criterion I = 1 Criterion II = 1 Criterion III = 0 / Total score = 0
CQ-Score of the publication
Criterion I = 1 Criterion II = 1 Criterion III = 0 / Total score = 0
CQ-Score of the publication
Criterion I = 1 Criterion II = 1 Criterion III = 0 / Total score = 0
CQ-Score of the publication
Criterion I = 1 Criterion II = 0 Criterion III = 0 / Total score = 0
CQ-Score of the publication
Criterion I = 1 Criterion II = 0 Criterion III = 0 / Total score = 0
CQ-Score of the publication
Criterion I = 1 Criterion II = 0 Criterion III = 0 / Total score = 0
CQ-Score of the publication
Criterion I = 0 Criterion II = 0 Criterion III = 0 / Total score = 0
CQ-Score of the publication
Criterion I = 1 Criterion II = 0 Criterion III = 0 / Total score = 0
CQ-Score of the publication
Criterion I = 1 Criterion II = 0 Criterion III = 0 / Total score = 0
CQ-Score of the publication
Criterion I = 1 Criterion II = 0 Criterion III = 0 / Total score = 0
CQ-Score of the publication
Criterion I = 1 Criterion II = 0 Criterion III = 0 / Total score = 0
CQ-Score of the publication
Criterion I = 1 Criterion II = 0 Criterion III = 0 / Total score = 0
CQ-Score of the publication
Criterion I = 0 Criterion II = 0 Criterion III = 0 / Total score = 0
